It goes on and on and on! Why, I ask is there such a desire
to limit; to limit access to information, to limit access to knowledge, to
limit the use of resources, to limit the desire to help some? Why? I think thinking is falling off the cliff! We skirt about the edges of real knowledge and then rush to make streets without plans and build buildings sans codes. All hurried in an attempt to harness the powers of persuasion, for deep in that persuasion lies the lonely seed of power.
"The power of population is indefinitely greater than the power in the earth to produce subsistence for man" -Malthus T.R. 1798. An Essay on the Principle of Population.
Some decades ago an English cleric and scholar had the wild
idea that resources on this planet are finite and that the population boom will
ultimately outstrip the resources leading to famine and chaos. His heart was in
the right place, but his conjecture as it turns out was misplaced. The human
capacity to change the future is limitless. What we can imagine we can create.
Think about the Star Trek tricorder and your iWatch or iPhone already can measure the
human body metrics.
Think about flying and from the Wright Brothers “Wright
Flyer”
we arrive at the latest “Hypersonic Technology Vehicle 2” that flies at 13,000 mph
(2011).
Think about the limited fossil fuel reserves and out comes the “Shale Fuel”
horizontal fracking technology, Solar and Wind power. Think about food and
associated changes of “crop rotation” and fertilizer use leads to a 35%
reduction in land use for more crop yields. Think about the movies in the
theaters to now having one on demand on your favorite tablet computer wherever you
go. Think about vinyl records and now stream the latest music on demand to a receiver
in your pocket. So Malthus was errant and from that error, unfortunately grew a
boatload of tyrants that decreed “One child policy” as in China under their
Chairman Mao, Eugenics in California and Nazi Germany and the start of the
bleeding heart Aid packages to third world nations. Malthusian vogue of crying
catastrophe was when the population had barely touched 3 billion on this
planet. Now for those keeping score it is at 7.1 billion. The destitution seen in
some countries is not for want of food, but for want of desire to cultivate for
it. The tyrants remain powerful and the citizenry depends on the tiny subsidy
to keep them relatively content. Meanwhile heart-rending photos are flashed
across the globe of children drinking from the polluted lakes to entice others
to donate to the cause, while the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
However through all the talk about “preventative checks” of population control, Malthus, himself was against “Poor Relief” and was more in line with Adam
Smith’s philosophy.
Speaking of what the U.S. Aid package, has done to those poor countries?
It has made the citizenry poorer and made their leaders rich! Check it out. De-incentivizing
the human mind is a crime of unparalleled proportion. It subjugates, it takes
the yearn out of the Yin and sets up a multitudes of frustrations. Eventually in pursuant to such goals, one runs out of other people's money!
The corpus of the entire thought remains an elegantly
designed Utopian mystery. Proponents of the “welfare state” stand erect and
demonize those that speak against it. Power and influence is a strong motivator
for those standing in between the “giver” and the “taker” and articulating the heartlessness
of those who point out to the chinks in the window pane. Indeed for these few and well-entrenched
society members the more citizens that can be forced to fill the roster sheets,
the better it is. However as the cartoon suggests, eventually the society crumbles as a whole. Since 1968 the United States has paid out $43 Trillion towards ending the "War on Poverty" and the problem has worsened! From boundless opportunities to Weber's bureaucratic rationales, we have arrived at today.
Unfortunately this Malthusian itch has gotten steeped into
the medical elite and the policy wonks that has created new and
enriched tortured data-sets to show the similar "virtue" in medicine. “Less is
More” is one of those itches and another is “Choosing Wisely.” Both are dream't
up in the philosophy of the Malthusian backers. Using “Bleeding heart”
technology and “futuristic shocks” as a correlational variables they have devised a path to
control the limitless human endeavor of innovation. Even the new innovative
movements are designed towards the power to limit. If screening of diseases
leads to early diagnosis and successful intervention, they use the power of
statistics to claim “harm!” If the appropriate treatment is costly then
convoluted algorithms define need. If the physician orders tests to determine
the real need in an individual then he is at odds of running afoul with the “Choosing
Wisely” program.
And here is the kicker...Whereas in national meetings the pontificating experts claim, "Don't just stand there, do something!" as in give an antibiotic to a diagnosis of pneumonia in the first 4 hours, in another breath state, "Don't do something, just stand there," implying as in screening for prostate cancer and breast cancer that screening leads to harm. This schizophrenia in the elite is a daunting jungle to traverse and if you are a patient, there is no help on the way!
And here is the kicker...Whereas in national meetings the pontificating experts claim, "Don't just stand there, do something!" as in give an antibiotic to a diagnosis of pneumonia in the first 4 hours, in another breath state, "Don't do something, just stand there," implying as in screening for prostate cancer and breast cancer that screening leads to harm. This schizophrenia in the elite is a daunting jungle to traverse and if you are a patient, there is no help on the way!
The buy-in from the physicians is less than stellar so the
pith and moment of the movement is to convince the public to read their
E-manual to basically give up the pursuit of living for the betterment of the society
after a certain age.
Forced limiting childbirth is like snuffing the potential of
innovation. Is that progress? Are we
progressive? Enabling entitlements limits desire/incentive and escalates the
status quo. Is that progress? Are we being progressive? Limiting use of resources
is to guide the principle that the future is bleak and therefore unsustainable.
Is that not proven wrong over the past 1000-years? Man was bipedal, walked a
few miles, then used beasts to travel further and now travels thousands of
miles without breaking a sweat. That is progress!
Data is the new buzz word. We define our very existence based
on data. In fact data has reached such an unparalleled position in our society
that we simply say, “data suggests…” and all is received and accepted.
Population data science is tortured to “best fit” in an individual, even if it
has no relevance. Life has become a virtual Amazon jungle with colorful
creatures that create strange and enticing sounds to woo and capture the spirit
of the yielding.
We now live in an ocean of data that keeps getting deeper
and deeper. We use data sciences and torture statistical methods to create an
artificial reality that does not exist. We package that as the future and sell
it to the hard-working populace that has little time to spend in thought and to
the easily fooled. As Emanuel Derman, a professor of financial engineering at
Columbia University states, “Statistics…is neither purely a language nor purely
a science of the natural world but, rather a collection of techniques to be
applied to test hypotheses.” He goes on to say, “Let us not get too enamored of
the data science, whose great triumphs so far are mainly in advertising and
persuasion.”
Oh my!
No comments:
Post a Comment