A friend asked me the other day, “why do you write?” And I
got to thinking, why do I write? The answer was simple, “because it gives me
pleasure.”
So I sat down to write me a story and there was nothing. The
words just did not want to write themselves. The story wasn’t there. Nothing
flowed. It was a series of one word followed by delete. No writer’s block, mind
you, just blah.
Figuring that the limited mojo had gone out for a walk, I
started with this…
Hmm…
(2 minutes later)
Hmm…
(5 minutes later)
You know the triple aboriginal thoughts of “Oh my!” “Now
what?” and “We’ll see,” happened all at once. The chaotic migratory pattern of
confusion has many a focus of blinding lights that are streamlets of
productivity. So, I latched on to one.
What if?
MTBF:
What if, there was a predictor of loss of function? You
know, like the one called MTBF (Mean Time Between Failure) in machines, only
associated with the human. Now that would be nice, wouldn’t it? Say, the
average MTBF of a modern day American is at 78 years. We could then use Baysean
logic and find out which elements of us will go awry and cause an early
departure from the land of the living.
That, of course would be predicated on
previously known and compiled human data and tailored to one’s deeds as a human.
Say, if one were sedentary, drank a lot of soda and ate bonbons all day and it
was determined that in many such individuals, this behavior caused Diabetes and
through that conduit, high blood pressure and thence a stroke, followed by
death from a heart attack, well that information would be a determinant of the
expected longevity in your case if you were into those things, now wouldn’t it?
Of course it would.
Choices:
Now suppose we added another wrinkle in the form of smoking
a cigarette, well then, the historical data would suggest a lower number of
smokers surviving till 78 years of age because of infirmity from emphysema,
chronic bronchitis and cancer. This predicate would be equally valid to reduce
the likelihood of survival to the 79th year.
And if you were to add
some fine wine, or just potato released Vodka to the mix, a head and neck
cancer would be the potential cause of death in many an individual. That would
lead to a reduced chance of living for an additional year too- thus higher morbidity and mortality. For another rung
to this ladder of survival complexity, we could add a chronic, unrecognized HPV
(Human Papiloma Virus) infection in the throat, and the whole drama would
certainly be played out much earlier in a lifetime. The HPV would be propelled into a state of furor, not Fuhrer ~ although at this point they are both the same damage causing agents. The inverse ratio lives;
the more the number of diseases, the lesser the chances of living longer. And
to a large extent that is predicated on human choice and lifestyle.
Null Hypothesis and the p-values:
In circumstances of many diseases, the rigid Algorithm of
the calculator under these circumstances would suggest, the possibility, that
survival at 78 years, although remote, is possible but beyond the calculated
realm of mathematical reality. The past always catches up to the present
eventually and limits the future. A meaningful number of p-value at 0.04,
negating the null hypothesis (that this was not the norm) gives little comfort
to the receiver (Only 95% of the tested population lives inside the bell
curve-depending of course on the selected criteria). Essentially negating the Null Hypothesis states that that this person’s
chance of survival is limited beyond "a coincidence" and the forces of his past
behavior are against him (this probability is based on the cumulative data from
a large cohort of individuals with similar behaviors and life-styles in the
past).
Now I know what you are thinking. This writer (me) has lost
it. He has gone mad. Yes, you are certainly entitled to your opinion, but guess
what, the words have started flowing, and you my friend have arrived here with
me. Haven't you?
Actuaries:
We actually do have the Actuarial data to determine future
outcomes of human beings. The Insurers use it all the time, but it is not that
accurate or detailed ~ although it remains the best so far. What might and may already be happening as I write and
you read this, IBM Watson programmers are shoveling this data, in spades, into
the machine and writing billions of lines of codes for the software algorithm
to project and predict the future. It is not to say that they will be
absolutely accurate, but it will be an improvement.
And don't forget the genetics:
But, you say, well that may be true, yet my grandfather died
at age ninety and he used to drink and smoke and was obese, how can your
projections or those of the future Watsons be accurate? Ah, my dear friend, you
are correct in your skepticism. There is the genetic code issue that we have
left out.
from Lew Rockwell.com
Soon the GWAS and the assays of various Oncogenic and Suppressor gene
data along with genetic and externally modulated epigenetic predictors for
cardiovascular, diabetes and all other diseases, will be accrued, assimilated
and digested for improved prediction. Watson of the near future will be able to
mix and match and eventually beep a better digital result of survival
probability ~ maybe even with a Confidence Interval (CI) of 97.5%.
“Doubt thou the stars are fire,
Doubt that the sun doth move…”
But doubt not the intent of human ingenuity and purpose.
Probability and Eventuality:
Remember probability determines the likelihood of an
eventuality and not the eventuality itself. So yes, some may dodge the single
bullet in the game of Russian Roulette and unhealthy living, but adding more
bullets into the chamber will certainly increase the chances of a mistimed
“bang!”
Russian Roulette:
So what if you empty the chamber of the gun; don’t smoke
(one less bullet), don’t drink (one less bullet), don’t eat in excess (one less
bullet), exercise (one less bullet) then that will add to the age to the
result. Even if you happen to have a genetic anomaly on one of the pair of the
chromosomes (allele), well, you will live out your `90-100 years and never know
it, because you did not challenge the remaining normal (good) gene with bad
habits. (It takes two mutated alleles to tango).
50 minutes later… we have a story. I think?
What if … you live a healthier life style?
Live Long, Live Well, Be Prosperous!